These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964234)
41. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induces current pulses in transcranial direct current stimulation electrodes. Peterchev AV; Dhamne SC; Kothare R; Rotenberg A Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():811-4. PubMed ID: 23366016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS. Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Uncertainty quantification in transcranial magnetic stimulation via high-dimensional model representation. Gomez LJ; Yücel AC; Hernandez-Garcia L; Taylor SF; Michielssen E IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):361-72. PubMed ID: 25203980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study. Gordon PC; Zrenner C; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner B; Brunoni AR; Ziemann U Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1024-1032. PubMed ID: 29921529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis. Datta A; Elwassif M; Battaglia F; Bikson M J Neural Eng; 2008 Jun; 5(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 18441418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation. Holdefer RN; Sadleir R; Russell MJ Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1388-97. PubMed ID: 16644273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models. Windhoff M; Opitz A; Thielscher A Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):923-35. PubMed ID: 22109746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review. Horvath JC; Forte JD; Carter O Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():213-36. PubMed ID: 25448853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS. Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jan; 109(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 23040278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Wagner T; Valero-Cabre A; Pascual-Leone A Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():527-65. PubMed ID: 17444810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression. Bai S; Dokos S; Ho KA; Loo C Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():332-44. PubMed ID: 24246487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation. Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. TMS modeling toolbox for realistic simulation. Cho YS; Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3113-6. PubMed ID: 21095745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Improved field localization in transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain with the utilization of a conductive shield plate in the stimulator. Kim DH; Georghiou GE; Won C IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):720-5. PubMed ID: 16602579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Finite difference time domain (FDTD) modeling of implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes and brain tissue. Gabran SR; Saad JH; Salama MM; Mansour RR Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6485-8. PubMed ID: 19964439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. FDTD-based Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation model applied to specific neurodegenerative disorders. Fanjul-Vélez F; Salas-García I; Ortega-Quijano N; Arce-Diego JL Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Jan; 118(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 25453382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology--a review of current data and future implications. Utz KS; Dimova V; Oppenländer K; Kerkhoff G Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2789-810. PubMed ID: 20542047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of posture on electric fields of non-invasive brain stimulation. Mikkonen M; Laakso I Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065019. PubMed ID: 30708366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of electrode-electrolyte spatial mismatch on transcranial direct current stimulation: a finite element modeling study. Chen L; Zou X; Tang R; Ke A; He J J Neural Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(5):056012. PubMed ID: 31195379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]