These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964234)

  • 61. Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.
    Tomio R; Akiyama T; Horikoshi T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():157-67. PubMed ID: 26391774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Bio-heat transfer model of transcranial DC stimulation: comparison of conventional pad versus ring electrode.
    Datta A; Elwassif M; Bikson M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():670-3. PubMed ID: 19964238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Amassian VE; Maccabee PJ
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1620-3. PubMed ID: 17946912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: a computational modeling study.
    Kessler SK; Minhas P; Woods AJ; Rosen A; Gorman C; Bikson M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e76112. PubMed ID: 24086698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
    Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on cortical activity: a computational modeling study.
    Molaee-Ardekani B; Márquez-Ruiz J; Merlet I; Leal-Campanario R; Gruart A; Sánchez-Campusano R; Birot G; Ruffini G; Delgado-García JM; Wendling F
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 22420944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study.
    Minhas P; Bikson M; Woods AJ; Rosen AR; Kessler SK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():859-62. PubMed ID: 23366028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A review of computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Bai S; Loo C; Dokos S
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 23510007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    De Lucia M; Parker GJ; Embleton K; Newton JM; Walsh V
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1159-70. PubMed ID: 17524673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Functional neuroimaging and transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Turi Z; Paulus W; Antal A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 43(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 22956648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Using increased structural detail of the cortex to improve the accuracy of modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on neocortical activation.
    Chen M; Mogul DJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1216-26. PubMed ID: 20142156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Opitz A; Windhoff M; Heidemann RM; Turner R; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2011 Oct; 58(3):849-59. PubMed ID: 21749927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
    Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS.
    Neuling T; Wagner S; Wolters CH; Zaehle T; Herrmann CS
    Front Psychiatry; 2012; 3():83. PubMed ID: 23015792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and brain atrophy: a computer-based human brain model study.
    Wagner T; Eden U; Fregni F; Valero-Cabre A; Ramos-Estebanez C; Pronio-Stelluto V; Grodzinsky A; Zahn M; Pascual-Leone A
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):539-50. PubMed ID: 18193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Implications for Nonmotor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.
    Rektorová I; Anderková Ľ
    Int Rev Neurobiol; 2017; 134():1091-1110. PubMed ID: 28805565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.