These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964513)

  • 21. EMG pattern recognition control of multifunctional prostheses by transradial amputees.
    Li G; Kuiken TA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6914-7. PubMed ID: 19964455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pattern recognition control outperforms conventional myoelectric control in upper limb patients with targeted muscle reinnervation.
    Hargrove LJ; Lock BA; Simon AM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1599-602. PubMed ID: 24110008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Real-time and simultaneous control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms.
    Ortiz-Catalan M; Håkansson B; Brånemark R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jul; 22(4):756-64. PubMed ID: 24710833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Role of Muscle Synergies in Real-Time Classification of Upper Limb Motions using Extreme Learning Machines.
    Antuvan CW; Bisio F; Marini F; Yen SC; Cambria E; Masia L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):76. PubMed ID: 27527511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prosthesis-guided training of pattern recognition-controlled myoelectric prosthesis.
    Chicoine CL; Simon AM; Hargrove LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1876-9. PubMed ID: 23366279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resolving the effect of wrist position on myoelectric pattern recognition control.
    Adewuyi AA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):39. PubMed ID: 28472991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving the Robustness of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Upper Limb Prostheses by Covariate Shift Adaptation.
    Vidovic MM; Hwang HJ; Amsuss S; Hahne JM; Farina D; Muller KR
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Sep; 24(9):961-970. PubMed ID: 26513794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Limb Position Tolerant Pattern Recognition for Myoelectric Prosthesis Control with Adaptive Sparse Representations From Extreme Learning.
    Betthauser JL; Hunt CL; Osborn LE; Masters MR; Levay G; Kaliki RR; Thakor NV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 65(4):770-778. PubMed ID: 28650804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interface Prostheses With Classifier-Feedback-Based User Training.
    Fang Y; Zhou D; Li K; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2575-2583. PubMed ID: 28026744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands.
    Segil JL; Controzzi M; Weir RF; Cipriani C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(9):1439-54. PubMed ID: 25803683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding Limb Position and External Load Effects on Real-Time Pattern Recognition Control in Amputees.
    Teh Y; Hargrove LJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jul; 28(7):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 32396094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Real-time myoelectric decoding of individual finger movements for a virtual target task.
    Smith RJ; Huberdeau D; Tenore F; Thakor NV
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2376-9. PubMed ID: 19965192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses.
    Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robust Pattern Recognition Myoelectric Training for Improved Online Control within a 3D Virtual Environment.
    Woodward RB; Hargrove LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4701-4704. PubMed ID: 30441399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of pattern recognition myoelectric control using a generic electrode grid with targeted muscle reinnervation patients.
    Tkach DC; Young AJ; Smith LH; Hargrove LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4319-23. PubMed ID: 23366883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current Trends and Confounding Factors in Myoelectric Control: Limb Position and Contraction Intensity.
    Campbell E; Phinyomark A; Scheme E
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32183215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of direct and pattern recognition control for a two degree-of-freedom above elbow virtual prosthesis.
    Toledo C; Simon A; Muñoz R; Vera A; Leija L; Hargrove L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4332-5. PubMed ID: 23366886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks.
    Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 20362374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Protocol for site selection and movement assessment for the myoelectric control of a multi-functional upper-limb prosthesis.
    Al-Timemy AH; Escudero J; Bugmann G; Outram N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5817-20. PubMed ID: 24111061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements.
    Krasoulis A; Kyranou I; Erden MS; Nazarpour K; Vijayakumar S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 28697795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.