114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19964799)
1. Theoretical comparisons of nerve and muscle activation by neuromuscular incapacitation devices.
Sweeney JD
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3188-90. PubMed ID: 19964799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electromagnetic modelling of current flow in the heart from TASER devices and the risk of cardiac dysrhythmias.
Holden SJ; Sheridan RD; Coffey TJ; Scaramuzza RA; Diamantopoulos P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(24):7193-209. PubMed ID: 18065834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Muscle contraction during electro-muscular incapacitation: A comparison between square-wave pulses and the TASER(®) X26 Electronic control device.
Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S95-100. PubMed ID: 20950313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac effects of varying pulse charge and polarity of TASER conducted electrical weapons.
Kroll MW; Panescu D; Carver M; Kroll RM; Hinz AF
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3195-8. PubMed ID: 19964054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating neuromuscular stimulation within the human torso with Taser stimulus.
Sun H; Webster JG
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6401-11. PubMed ID: 17951851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TASER conducted electrical weapons and implanted pacemakers and defibrillators.
Vanga SR; Bommana S; Kroll MW; Swerdlow C; Lakkireddy D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3199-204. PubMed ID: 19964055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical safety of TASER conducted energy weapon in a hybrid 3-point deployment mode.
Panescu D; Kroll MW; Stratbucker RA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3191-4. PubMed ID: 19964800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulse variations of a conducted energy weapon (similar to the TASER X26 device): effects on muscle contraction and threshold for ventricular fibrillation*.
Beason CW; Jauchem JR; Clark CD; Parker JE; Fines DA
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 19737245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twitch potentiation after voluntary contraction and neuromuscular electrical stimulation at various frequencies in human quadriceps femoris.
Miyamoto N; Fukutani A; Yanai T; Kawakami Y
Muscle Nerve; 2012 Jan; 45(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 22190316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quadriceps femoris muscle torques and fatigue generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with three different waveforms.
Laufer Y; Ries JD; Leininger PM; Alon G
Phys Ther; 2001 Jul; 81(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 11444994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theoretical possibility of ventricular fibrillation during use of TASER neuromuscular incapacitation devices.
Panescu D; Kroll MW; Stratbucker RA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5671-4. PubMed ID: 19164004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
Jauchem JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In silico estimates of cell electroporation by electrical incapacitation waveforms.
Gowrishankar TR; Esser AT; Smith KC; Burns SK; Weaver JC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6505-8. PubMed ID: 19964168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contractile properties of single motor units in human toe extensors assessed by intraneural motor axon stimulation.
Macefield VG; Fuglevand AJ; Bigland-Ritchie B
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jun; 75(6):2509-19. PubMed ID: 8793760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element modeling of electric field effects of TASER devices on nerve and muscle.
Panescu D; Kroll MW; Efimov IR; Sweeney JD
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1277-9. PubMed ID: 17946454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
Ho J; Dawes DM; Kunz SN; Satpathy R; Klein L; Driver B; Stang JL
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central Contribution to Electrically Induced Fatigue depends on Stimulation Frequency.
Grosprêtre S; Gueugneau N; Martin A; Lepers R
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1530-1540. PubMed ID: 28291023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
