111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19965002)
1. Mammogram enhancement using alpha weighted quadratic filter.
Zhou Y; Panetta K; Agaian S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3681-4. PubMed ID: 19965002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonlinear unsharp masking for mammogram enhancement.
Panetta K; Zhou Y; Agaian S; Jia H
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):918-28. PubMed ID: 21843996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SVM based system for classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Singh S; Kumar V; Verma HK; Singh D
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4747-50. PubMed ID: 17945853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.
Bliznakova K; Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5604-17. PubMed ID: 21158272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient Denoising Framework for Mammogram Images with a New Impulse Detector and Non-Local Means.
Rajaguru H; S R SC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jan; 21(1):179-183. PubMed ID: 31983182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms.
Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4256-69. PubMed ID: 18072490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
Vikhe PS; Thool VR
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
