295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19966139)
1. Overview of genotoxic impurities in pharmaceutical development.
Bercu JP; Dobo KL; Gocke E; McGovern TJ
Int J Toxicol; 2009; 28(6):468-78. PubMed ID: 19966139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent developments in the risk assessment of potentially genotoxic impurities in pharmaceutical drug substances.
Humfrey CD
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Nov; 100(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17656486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of cumulative carcinogenic risk for multiple genotoxic impurities in a new drug substance.
Bercu JP; Hoffman WP; Lee C; Ness DK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 18550240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The application of structure-based assessment to support safety and chemistry diligence to manage genotoxic impurities in active pharmaceutical ingredients during drug development.
Dobo KL; Greene N; Cyr MO; Caron S; Ku WW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 16464524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rationale for determining, testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that possess potential for genotoxicity.
Müller L; Mauthe RJ; Riley CM; Andino MM; Antonis DD; Beels C; DeGeorge J; De Knaep AG; Ellison D; Fagerland JA; Frank R; Fritschel B; Galloway S; Harpur E; Humfrey CD; Jacks AS; Jagota N; Mackinnon J; Mohan G; Ness DK; O'Donovan MR; Smith MD; Vudathala G; Yotti L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16412543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicological overview of impurities in pharmaceutical products.
Jacobson-Kram D; McGovern T
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2007 Jan; 59(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17188779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies for the identification, control and determination of genotoxic impurities in drug substances: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.
Raman NV; Prasad AV; Ratnakar Reddy K
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2011 Jun; 55(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 21193280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overall impact of the regulatory requirements for genotoxic impurities on the drug development process.
Giordani A; Kobel W; Gally HU
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2011 May; 43(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 21420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks of p-nitrophenol when it is present as an impurity in a drug product.
Eichenbaum G; Johnson M; Kirkland D; O'Neill P; Stellar S; Bielawne J; DeWire R; Areia D; Bryant S; Weiner S; Desai-Krieger D; Guzzie-Peck P; Evans DC; Tonelli A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19500632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities.
Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control and analysis of alkyl and benzyl halides and other related reactive organohalides as potential genotoxic impurities in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
Elder DP; Lipczynski AM; Teasdale A
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Nov; 48(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 18657926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. International Conference on Harmonisation; revised guidance on Q3B(R) Impurities in New Drug Products; Availability. Notice.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2003 Nov; 68(220):64628-9. PubMed ID: 14619944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Drug substances presented as sulfonic acid salts: overview of utility, safety and regulation.
Elder DP; Snodin DJ
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 61(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 19222899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An impact analysis of the application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceuticals.
Delaney EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Nov; 49(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 17888551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines and pharmacopoeial standards for pharmaceutical impurities: overview and critical assessment.
Snodin DJ; McCrossen SD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):298-312. PubMed ID: 22507740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of compound-specific acceptable daily intakes for 11 mutagenic carcinogens used in pharmaceutical synthesis.
Ellis P; Kenyon M; Dobo K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 23228434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In silico approaches to predicting cancer potency for risk assessment of genotoxic impurities in drug substances.
Bercu JP; Morton SM; Deahl JT; Gombar VK; Callis CM; van Lier RB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010; 57(2-3):300-6. PubMed ID: 20363275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. International Conference on Harmonisation; revised guidance on Q3A impurities in new drug substances; availability. Notice.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2003 Feb; 68(28):6924-5. PubMed ID: 12583358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Viracept (nelfinavir)--ethyl methanesulfonate case: a threshold risk assessment for human exposure to a genotoxic drug contamination?
Lutz WK
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 19695319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
