These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. How many exemplars are used? Explorations with the Rex Leopold I model. De Schryver M; Vandist K; Rosseel Y Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 19293104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use. Bradmetz J; Mathy F Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):211-34. PubMed ID: 17093950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning. Rehder B; Hoffman AB Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction. Hemmer P; Steyvers M Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 19145014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Presentation Order on Category Transfer. Mathy F; Feldman J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jan; 63(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 27025535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Love BC Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 12613690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning. Ashby FG; Maddox WT; Bohil CJ Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):666-77. PubMed ID: 12219884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both? Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similarity and the development of rules. Gentner D; Medina J Cognition; 1998 Jan; 65(2-3):263-97. PubMed ID: 9557385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Context dependent learning in the serial RT task. Abrahamse EL; Verwey WB Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 17674034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two pathways to stimulus encoding in category learning? Davis T; Love BC; Maddox WT Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):394-413. PubMed ID: 19460948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize. Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Information-integration category learning and the human uncertainty response. Paul EJ; Boomer J; Smith JD; Ashby FG Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):536-54. PubMed ID: 21264597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems. Waldron EM; Ashby FG Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 11340863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects. Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criterial noise effects on rule-based category learning: the impact of delayed feedback. Ell SW; Ing AD; Maddox WT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1263-75. PubMed ID: 19633342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia). Makino H; Jitsumori M J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flankers facilitate 3-year-olds' performance in a card-sorting task. Jordan PL; Morton JB Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):265-74. PubMed ID: 18194025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]