These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19967360)

  • 1. Changes in occlusal force after intraoral one-stage curved osteotomy of the prominent mandibular angle.
    Tan W; Gui L; Wang M; Qiu S; Chen Y; Niu F; Yu B; Liu J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 19967360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The influence on masticatory function after curved osteotomy of prominent mandibular angle].
    Tan WY; Qiu S; Wang M; Chen Y; Niu F; Yu B; Liu JF; Gui L
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 26(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 20540309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after orthognathic surgery for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Ohkura K; Harada K; Morishima S; Enomoto S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 11174588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bite force and occlusal contact area changes following mandibular widening using distraction osteogenesis.
    Alkan A; Arici S; Sato S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 16545704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement and setback mandible on occlusal force and masticatory efficiency].
    Yang X; Dong Y; Zhang G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jan; 30(1):3-5, 63. PubMed ID: 7789231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year follow-up of changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Choi YJ; Lim H; Chung CJ; Park KH; Kim KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(6):742-7. PubMed ID: 24630069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Kikuta T; Hara I; Seto T; Yoshioka I; Nakashima T; Yasumitsu C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 8006486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
    Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in occlusal state of patients with mandibular prognathism after orthognathic surgery: a pilot study.
    Nagai I; Tanaka N; Noguchi M; Suda Y; Sonoda T; Kohama G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 39(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 11735137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial frontal morphological changes related to mandibular setback osteotomy using cephalograms.
    Amano K; Yagi T; Iida S; Aikawa T; Yamashiro T; Takada K; Kogo M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):412-6. PubMed ID: 19482484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoral curved ostectomy for prominent mandibular angle by grinding, contiguous drilling, and chiseling.
    Liu D; Huang J; Shan L; Wang J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2109-13. PubMed ID: 22067875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evaluation of jaw function subsequent to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Yang XW; Dong YJ; Long X; Zhang GZ; Kao CT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15953911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular oblique ostectomy: an alternative procedure to reduce the width of the lower face.
    Yang J; Wang L; Xu H; Tai N; Fan Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1822-6. PubMed ID: 19816358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of tunable guide device in prominent mandibular angle osteotomy].
    Yu LG; Han JY; Mu XZ
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jan; 26(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 20432921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes of mandibular movement tracings after the correction of mandibular protrusion by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Wang D; Fu H; Zeng R; Yang X
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2238-44. PubMed ID: 19761919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.