437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19967546)
1. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.
Richter A; Schütz C; Hauck M; Halm H
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19967546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.
Richter A; Halm HF; Hauck M; Quante M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 22643187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical treatment of the spinal stenosis with an interspinous distraction device: do we really restore the foraminal height?
Celik H; Derincek A; Koksal I
Turk Neurosurg; 2012; 22(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22274971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coflex interspinous process dynamic stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up.
Du MR; Wei FL; Zhu KL; Song RM; Huan Y; Jia B; Gu JT; Pan LX; Zhou HY; Qian JX; Zhou CP
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 81():462-468. PubMed ID: 33222963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kuchta J; Sobottke R; Eysel P; Simons P
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 19387698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?
Korovessis P; Repantis T; Zacharatos S; Zafiropoulos A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):830-40. PubMed ID: 19387697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Radiographic study of Coflex interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Pan AX; Hai Y; Yang JC; Chen XL; Yuan W; Guo H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 54(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 27373477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li AM; Li X; Yang Z
Int J Surg; 2017 Apr; 40():60-67. PubMed ID: 28254421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Device implanted complications of Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization].
Zang L; Hai Y; Su QJ; Lu SB; Zhang CS; Yang JC; Guan L; Kang N; Meng XL; Liu T; Du P
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 50(9):782-7. PubMed ID: 23157951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study.
Yuan W; Su QJ; Liu T; Yang JC; Kang N; Guan L; Hai Y
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 35():24-29. PubMed ID: 27815024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decompression alone versus fusion and Coflex in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A network meta-analysis.
Fan Y; Zhu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(11):e19457. PubMed ID: 32176077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decompression and interspinous dynamic stabilization using the locker for lumbar canal stenosis associated with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Lee DY; Lee SH; Shim CS; Lee HY
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Jun; 53(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 20809452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet after insertion of interspinous implant.
Chung KJ; Hwang YS; Koh SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E380-3. PubMed ID: 19404170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and efficacy of a new percutaneously implantable interspinous process device.
Kantelhardt SR; Török E; Gempt J; Stoffel M; Ringel F; Stüer C; Meyer B
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Nov; 152(11):1961-7. PubMed ID: 20635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
Chen YH; Xu D; Xu HZ; Chi YL; Wang XY; Huang QS
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Dec; 22(12):902-5. PubMed ID: 20112569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
