These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19968158)

  • 1. Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson's (closed) vs Milligan Morgan's technique (open).
    Pokharel N; Chhetri RK; Malla B; Joshi HN; Shrestha RK
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2009 Jun; 11(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 19968158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure compared with Milligan-Morgan operation.
    Thorbeck CV; Montes MF
    Eur J Surg; 2002; 168(8-9):482-4. PubMed ID: 12549689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy.
    Khan NF; Hussain Shah SS; Bokhari I; Mahboob S; Gulfam MA; Ghayasuddin M; Khan A; Rasul S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Sep; 19(9):561-5. PubMed ID: 19728941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Transfixed stitches technique versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Results of a randomised trial].
    Gaj F; Trecca A; Crispino P
    Chir Ital; 2007; 59(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 17500180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of the rubber band ligation with Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.
    Ali SA; Mohammad AT; Jarwar M; Imran J; Siddique AJ; Dalwani AG
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(4):56-60. PubMed ID: 22455262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between open and closed hemorrhoidectomy.
    Khalil-ur-Rehman ; Hasan A; Taimur M; Imran M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 22830163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Usefulness of lateral internal sphincterotomy combined with hemorrhoidectomy by the Milligan-Morgan's technique: results of a prospective randomized trial].
    Amorotti C; Mosca D; Trenti C; Pintaudi U
    Chir Ital; 2003; 55(6):879-86. PubMed ID: 14725229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The gold standard in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy vs Longo mucoprolapsectomy: comparing techniques].
    Candela G; Varriale S; Di Libero L; Manetta F; Maschio A; Giordano M; Pizza A; Sciascia V; Napolitano S; Santini L
    Minerva Chir; 2007 Jun; 62(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 17519839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic scalpel].
    Di Vita G; Patti R; Petrone R; Arcara M; Sieli G
    G Chir; 2003; 24(11-12):422-7. PubMed ID: 15018412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results.
    Palimento D; Picchio M; Attanasio U; Lombardi A; Bambini C; Renda A
    World J Surg; 2003 Feb; 27(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 12616437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of the effects on anal function of Milligan-Morgan versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy.
    Jóhannsson HO; Påhlman L; Graf W
    Br J Surg; 2006 Oct; 93(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 16952213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open versus closed haemorrhoidectomy.
    Uba AF; Obekpa PO; Ardill W
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Jun; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 15300265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.
    Mehigan BJ; Monson JR; Hartley JE
    Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9206):782-5. PubMed ID: 10711925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open haemorrhoidectomy revisited.
    Uba AF; Ihezue CH; Obekpa PO; Iya D; Legbo JN
    Niger J Med; 2001; 10(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 11806002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. Personal experience].
    Mistrangelo M; Mussa B; Brustia R; Gavello G; Mussa A
    Ann Ital Chir; 2009; 80(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 20131537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised trial comparing submucosal haemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. diathermic haemorrhoidectomy.
    Filingeri V; Gravante G; Baldessari E; Craboledda P; Bellati F; Casciani CU
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2004; 8(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 15267121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy.
    Bikhchandani J; Agarwal PN; Kant R; Malik VK
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jan; 189(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 15701493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation.
    Milito G; Gargiani M; Cortese F
    Tech Coloproctol; 2002 Dec; 6(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 12525911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective randomised multi-centre trial comparing the clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of circular stapled anopexy with closed diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.
    Thaha MA; Campbell KL; Kazmi SA; Irvine LA; Khalil A; Binnie NR; Hendry WS; Walker A; Staines HJ; Steele RJ
    Gut; 2009 May; 58(5):668-78. PubMed ID: 19091821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan-Morgan cold scalpel technique.
    Pandini LC; Nahas SC; Nahas CS; Marques CF; Sobrado CW; Kiss DR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):592-5. PubMed ID: 16919112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.