These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19968302)

  • 1. Protein-ligand docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLSDOCK).
    Viji SN; Prasad PA; Gautham N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2687-94. PubMed ID: 19968302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling.
    Arun Prasad P; Gautham N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008 Nov; 22(11):815-29. PubMed ID: 18465087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An efficient molecular docking using conformational space annealing.
    Lee K; Czaplewski C; Kim SY; Lee J
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 15538770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies.
    Kämper A; Apostolakis J; Rarey M; Marian CM; Lengauer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):903-11. PubMed ID: 16563022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking.
    Kerzmann A; Fuhrmann J; Kohlbacher O; Neumann D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking.
    Yang JM; Chen CC
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. iMOLSDOCK: Induced-fit docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLS).
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jun; 74():89-99. PubMed ID: 28365533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
    Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approach.
    Wang J; Kollman PA; Kuntz ID
    Proteins; 1999 Jul; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10373002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular docking studies of protein-nucleotide complexes using MOLSDOCK (mutually orthogonal Latin squares DOCK).
    Viji SN; Balaji N; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2012 Aug; 18(8):3705-22. PubMed ID: 22382575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
    Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; Augustyniak R; Ginalski K
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A filter enhanced sampling and combinatorial scoring study for protein docking in CAPRI.
    Gong XQ; Chang S; Zhang QH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Ma XH; Wang MH; Liu B; He HQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 17803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques.
    Good AC; Cheney DL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12798388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein-small molecule docking with receptor flexibility in iMOLSDOCK.
    Sam Paul D; Gautham N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):889-900. PubMed ID: 30128925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.