These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19968445)

  • 1. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.
    Johnson EK; Bruggeman L; Cutler A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):633-645. PubMed ID: 28744902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of voice familiarity on attention to speech in a cocktail party scenario.
    Har-Shai Yahav P; Sharaabi A; Zion Golumbic E
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Jan; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 38142293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Language-general versus language-specific processes in bilingual voice learning.
    Lloy L; Patil KN; Johnson KA; Babel M
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105866. PubMed ID: 38971020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language exposure facilitates talker learning prior to language comprehension, even in adults.
    Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():36-40. PubMed ID: 26113447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Talker Familiarity on Sentence Recognition Accuracy in Complex Noise.
    Buntrock MS; Barker BA; Gurries MM; Barrett TS
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Jan; 68(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 34109807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human voice recognition depends on language ability.
    Perrachione TK; Del Tufo SN; Gabrieli JD
    Science; 2011 Jul; 333(6042):595. PubMed ID: 21798942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.