These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19968446)

  • 1. Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays.
    Paterson KB; Jordan TR; Kurtev S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19968446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.
    Jordan TR; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 21457952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dichotomy between luminance and disparity features at binocular fixations.
    Liu Y; Cormack LK; Bovik AC
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):23. PubMed ID: 21047755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linking physiology with behaviour: Functional specialisation of the visual field is reflected in gaze patterns during visual search.
    Pflugshaupt T; von Wartburg R; Wurtz P; Chaves S; Déruaz A; Nyffeler T; von Arx S; Luethi M; Cazzoli D; Mueri RM
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 19022277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binocular coordination of saccades in 7 years old children in single word reading and target fixation.
    Bucci MP; Kapoula Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 16005488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data.
    Nuthmann A; Kliegl R
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):31.1-28. PubMed ID: 19757909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periodic letter strokes within a word affect fixation disparity during reading.
    Jainta S; Jaschinski W; Wilkins AJ
    J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):2. PubMed ID: 21149306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vergence responses to vertical binocular disparity during lexical identification.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Jones MO; Liversedge SP
    Vision Res; 2015 Jan; 106():27-35. PubMed ID: 25433156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocularity during reading fixations: Properties of the minimum fixation disparity.
    Jainta S; Hoormann J; Kloke WB; Jaschinski W
    Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(18):1775-85. PubMed ID: 20573592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binocular motor coordination during saccades and fixations while reading: a magnitude and time analysis.
    Vernet M; Kapoula Z
    J Vis; 2009 Jul; 9(7):2. PubMed ID: 19761317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.
    Juhasz BJ; Liversedge SP; White SJ; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1614-25. PubMed ID: 16873112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry.
    van Dam LC; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):787-99. PubMed ID: 16309727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.