These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19969012)

  • 1. Measuring the spread of spreading suppression: a time-course analysis of spreading suppression and its impact on attentional selection.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Andrews L; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2010 Feb; 50(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 19969012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search at isoluminance: evidence for enhanced color weighting in standard sub-set and preview-based visual search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Watson DG; Andrews L; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1414-25. PubMed ID: 20102725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: evidence from negative color carry-over effects.
    Dent K; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 21484507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast color grouping and slow color inhibition: evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 17563218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.
    Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(11):1464-78. PubMed ID: 17433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search.
    Osugi T
    Vision Res; 2023 Aug; 209():108262. PubMed ID: 37210863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual change with moving displays: more evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 12967221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of colour on preview search: anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):389-415. PubMed ID: 15559111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Aug; 47(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 12852934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.