These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19969482)

  • 41. Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Ounsi HF; Salameh Z; Al-Shalan T; Ferrari M; Grandini S; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 17509417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
    Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Lopes HP; Ferreira AA; Elias CN; Moreira EJ; de Oliveira JC; Siqueira JF
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1013-6. PubMed ID: 19567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Pruett JP; Clement DJ; Carnes DL
    J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 9220735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals.
    You SY; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Shon WJ; Lee W
    J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1991-4. PubMed ID: 21092819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Florek H
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
    Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion.
    Franco V; Fabiani C; Taschieri S; Malentacca A; Bortolin M; Del Fabbro M
    J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1398-401. PubMed ID: 21924190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of root canal preparation using reciprocating Safesiders stainless steel and Vortex nickel-titanium instruments.
    Rhodes SC; Hülsmann M; McNeal SF; Beck P; Eleazer PD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 21411348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Melo MC; Bahia MG; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
    Int Endod J; 2010 Mar; 43(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20158534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of cervical preflaring using different rotary nickel-titanium systems on the accuracy of apical file size determination.
    Tennert C; Herbert J; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT
    J Endod; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1669-72. PubMed ID: 20850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
    Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.