These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1997305)

  • 1. [Intolerance reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in cardiac diagnosis. A randomized double-blind study].
    Machraoui A; Hinrichsen M; Jäger D; Lemke B; Drews S; Lange S; Barmeyer J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(9):321-6. PubMed ID: 1997305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
    Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
    Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
    Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of a new monomeric nonionic radiographic contrast medium (iobitridol-350 versus NaCl) on cutaneous microcirculation: single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase IV study in parallel group design.
    Bach R; Gerk U; Mrowietz C; Jung F
    Microvasc Res; 2000 Nov; 60(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 11078635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
    Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparative effects of ionic versus nonionic agents in cardiac catheterization.
    Benotti JR
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S366-73. PubMed ID: 3058641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen-contrast media upon ex vivo hemostasis in rabbits].
    Klimanova EV; Petrukhina GN; Makarov VA; Sergeev PV; Bolotova EN; Shimanovskiĭ NL
    Eksp Klin Farmakol; 2006; 69(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16579063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
    Vijayalakshmi K; Williams D; Wright RA; Hall JA; Harcombe AA; Linker NJ; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 16(12):707-11. PubMed ID: 15596875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of monoionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on cutaneous microcirculation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Franzeck UK; Schalch I; Seiler Y; Schneider E; Bollinger A
    Microvasc Res; 1995 Jul; 50(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 7476576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions to nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wink K
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):384-8. PubMed ID: 3175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
    Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute side effects of iopromide and diatrizoate in urography.
    Sahin H; Bircan MK; Akay AF; Kuru AF
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):734-5. PubMed ID: 9817053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic adverse effects of contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wagner J; Zwicker B
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 8165845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
    Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.