106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1997951)
21. A gentle and easy death: from ancient Greece to beyond Cruzan toward a reasoned legal response to the societal dilemma of euthanasia.
Messinger TJ
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1993; 71(1):175-251. PubMed ID: 11652682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Creating and supporting the proxy-decider: the lawyer-proxy relationship.
Dubler NN
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):517-38. PubMed ID: 15119324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Understanding advance directives and amendments to guardianship law.
Weber SM
Pa Med; 1992 Jun; 95(6):12-5. PubMed ID: 1614709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Does a living will equal a DNR? Are living wills compromising patient safety?
Mirarchi FL
J Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 33(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 17976563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: theory and the evolution of living will laws.
Glick HR; Hays SP
J Polit; 1991 Aug; 53(3):835-49. PubMed ID: 11651340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The faulty promise of living wills.
Carey J
US News World Rep; 1989 Jul; 107(4):63-4. PubMed ID: 11653855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis.
Steinle SJ
Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. New law will require providers to inform patients of living wills.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1990 Dec; 20(49):20. PubMed ID: 10108077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Implications of the Cruzan decisions for nurses.
Murphy P
N J Nurse; 1990; 20(5):7. PubMed ID: 2216680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Withholding and withdrawing therapy--how does the physician make a decision?].
Neumann P
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2009 May; 44(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 19440947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal and ethical considerations of "living will".
Huilgol N
Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 15125415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the living will statutes of the fifty states.
Condie CJ
J Contemp Law; 1988; 14(1):105-29. PubMed ID: 11650357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cruzan: right to die questions unanswered.
Scofield GR
Healthspan; 1990 Sep; 7(8):16-20. PubMed ID: 10107135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.
Caralis PV
J Fla Med Assoc; 1990 Sep; 77(9):821-8. PubMed ID: 2121893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. After the Cruzan case.
America (NY); 1991 Jan; 164(3):51. PubMed ID: 15991417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Videotaping living wills: dying declarations brought to life.
Buckley WR
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 22(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 11650089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
