These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1998297)

  • 1. Comparison of treatment effects with labial and lingual fixed appliances.
    Gorman JC; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Mar; 99(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 1998297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of the vertical variations in the anterior region of Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated with different techniques].
    Hamamci O
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 2489155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate.
    Chung KR; Kook YA; Kim SH; Mo SS; Jung JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 18174081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Investigation of pre- and post-treatment cephalometric measurements of the subjects treated by Edgewise technique].
    Erdem A; Deniz E; Ceylan I
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2101658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.
    Wu AK; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Rabie AB; Wiechmann D
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():176-8. PubMed ID: 22073476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention.
    Sadowsky C; Schneider BJ; BeGole EA; Tahir E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 8074088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of treatment results of adult deep-bite cases treated with lingual and labial fixed appliances.
    Pamukçu H; Özsoy ÖP
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Sep; 91(5):590-596. PubMed ID: 33886959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.
    Bock NC; Ruf S; Wiechmann D; Jilek T
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome assessment of lingual and labial appliances compared with cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, and objective grading system in Angle Class II extraction cases.
    Deguchi T; Terao F; Aonuma T; Kataoka T; Sugawara Y; Yamashiro T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 25153130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors for Class II treatment duration.
    Popowich K; Nebbe B; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15775943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Two-dimensional wire-technic].
    Gabba G; Lanteri C
    Mondo Ortod; 1987; 12(6):61-5. PubMed ID: 3483926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cephalometric evaluation of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion cases treated with the Bimler appliance].
    Calegari MA; Petrelli E; Rodrigues AM
    Dens (Curitiba); 1990; 6(1-2):16-24. PubMed ID: 2131271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.