These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1998620)

  • 21. The menstrual history: old limitations, new prospects.
    Gardosi J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 13(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 10079484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dating pregnancy. Gathering and using a reliable data base.
    Nichols C
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1987; 32(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 3305812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring gestational age: an uncertain proposition.
    Berg AT; Bracken MB
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Apr; 99(4):280-2. PubMed ID: 1581272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of cesarean delivery when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with definite last menstrual period.
    Grewal J; Zhang J; Mikolajczyk RT; Ford J
    Am J Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 27(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 20232279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discrepancy in term calculation from second trimester ultrasound scan versus last menstrual period in women with type 1 diabetes.
    Eidem I; Vangen S; Henriksen T; Vollset SE; Hanssen KF; Joner G; Stene LC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Aug; 93(8):809-16. PubMed ID: 24807126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.
    Lynch CD; Zhang J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():86-96. PubMed ID: 17803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Precision in estimating gestational age and its influence on sensitivity of alphafetoprotein screening.
    Roberts CJ; Hibbard BM; Evans DR; Evans KT; Laurence KM; Hoole M; Roberts E; Ennis WP
    Br Med J; 1979 Apr; 1(6169):981-3. PubMed ID: 86376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth?
    Yang H; Kramer MS; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Morin I; Wilkins R; Usher R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 186(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 11904603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester.
    Hoffman CS; Messer LC; Mendola P; Savitz DA; Herring AH; Hartmann KE
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 22(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 19000297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Down syndrome and neural tube defect screening: the value of using gestational age by ultrasonography.
    Benn PA; Borgida A; Horne D; Briganti S; Collins R; Rodis JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 176(5):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9166168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gestational age estimates from singleton births conceived using assisted reproductive technology.
    Callaghan WM; Schieve LA; Dietz PM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():79-85. PubMed ID: 17803621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of gestational age by last menstrual period, by ultrasound scan and by SP1 concentration: comparisons with date of delivery.
    Ahmed AG; Klopper A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 93(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 3511954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement.
    Daya S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 168(3 Pt 1):903-8. PubMed ID: 8456899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Morphological and molecular characteristics of living human fetuses between Carnegie stages 7 and 23: ultrasound scanning and direct measurements.
    Harkness LM; Rodger M; Baird DT
    Hum Reprod Update; 1997; 3(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 9193936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alternative method of gestational age assessment by the measurement of human erythrocyte differentiation antigen expression.
    Elliott MJ; Cassano WF
    J Perinatol; 1991 Sep; 11(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 1919827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations.
    Kramer MS; McLean FH; Boyd ME; Usher RH
    JAMA; 1988 Dec; 260(22):3306-8. PubMed ID: 3054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability factors of delivery due dates.
    Naeye RL
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Mar; 22(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 439089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating gestational age in utero.
    Bowie JD; Andreotti RF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1982 Jun; 20(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 7048407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Determination of gestational age by ultrasound].
    Karásková I; Kravka A
    Cesk Gynekol; 1990 Aug; 55(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 2225096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.