98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1998834)
1. Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination.
Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Okada M; Hachiya J; Furuya Y
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jan; 64(757):20-8. PubMed ID: 1998834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner.
Wu TH; Huang YH; Lee JJ; Wang SY; Wang SC; Su CT; Chen LK; Chu TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jan; 31(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 14534833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk.
Mini RL; Vock P; Mury R; Schneeberger PP
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 7724783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations.
Fearon T; Vucich J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 3491508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Determination of computer tomography dose index by means of ion chamber measurements].
Piermattei A; Cichocki F; Rossi G; Venga L; Arcovito G
Radiol Med; 1995; 89(1-2):151-4. PubMed ID: 7716297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations.
Fujii K; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Kawaura C
Br J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 80(956):657-67. PubMed ID: 17762056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Organ equivalent doses of patients undergoing chest computed tomography: measurements with TL dosimeters in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Gonzaga NB; Mourão AP; Magalhães MJ; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt C():242-4. PubMed ID: 23972586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation.
Hohl C; Suess C; Wildberger JE; Honnef D; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Schaller A; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 18227544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A practical method for determining organ dose during CT examination.
Cheung T; Cheng Q; Feng D
Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Feb; 65(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 16979343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomographic scanning in children: II. An updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial scanners.
Brasch RC; Cann CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6976686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of in-plane shields during thoracic CT.
Foley SJ; McEntee MF; Rainford LA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 23460031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.
Hunold P; Vogt FM; Schmermund A; Debatin JF; Kerkhoff G; Budde T; Erbel R; Ewen K; Barkhausen J
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 12511683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
