BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19992293)

  • 1. Radio-Opaque Calcification of the Fallopian Tubes with Tubal Patency: (Section of Obstetrics and Gynæcology).
    Bond SA
    Proc R Soc Med; 1940 Sep; 33(11):735-6. PubMed ID: 19992293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis of fallopian tube patency.
    Shah SM; Towobola OA; Masihleho M
    East Afr Med J; 2005 Sep; 82(9):457-62. PubMed ID: 16619719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between Seropositivity of Chlamydia Trachomatis and Tubal and/or Pelvic Pathology Detected by Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Subfertile Women.
    Begum N; Anwary SA; Alfazzaman M; Mahzabin Z; Deeba F; Mostafa MA; Akhter M; Rahman MM
    Mymensingh Med J; 2017 Oct; 26(4):840-845. PubMed ID: 29208873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and related factors of tubal patency after methotrexate treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy.
    Seyedoshohadaei F; Mohammadbeigi R; Tahmuri A; Ghaderi E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Mar; 42(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 26694788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficiency of hysterosalpingo-contrastsonography (HyCoSy) in the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Cimen G; Trak B; Elpek G; Simsek T; Erman O
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Sep; 19(5):516-8. PubMed ID: 15512379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.
    Robertshaw IM; Sroga JM; Batcheller AE; Martinez AM; Winter TC; Sinning K; Maxwell R; Lindheim SR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27126400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis].
    Salata I; Gottwald L; Sobkiewicz S
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of sonohysterography in the diagnosis of tubal patency among infertile patients.
    Malek-Mellouli M; Gharbi H; Reziga H
    Tunis Med; 2013 Jun; 91(6):387-90. PubMed ID: 23868036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the efficacy of sonosalpingography and hysterosalpingogram to test the tubal patency in all women with primary and secondary infertility.
    Malik B; Patil S; Boricha BG; Kurkal N; Choudhry M
    Ultrasound Q; 2014 Jun; 30(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 24850029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The incidence of fallopian tube patency after transcervical resection of the endometrium including rollerball diathermy to the tubal ostia.
    Istre O; Daleng W; Forman A
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):198-200. PubMed ID: 8557142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Assessment Methods for Fallopian Tubal Patency and Peritubal Adhesion Between Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation.
    He Y; Ma X; Xu J; Li S; Wu H; Liu Q; Kong L; Luo J; Liu H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28151551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-to-end tubal anastomosis using an absorbable stent.
    Ansari AH
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Aug; 32(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 467701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fluid dynamics of injection: variables as they relate to transvaginal gamete intra-fallopian transfer and tubal embryo transfer.
    Woolcott R; Stanger J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1670-2. PubMed ID: 7836515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of current methods of tubal patency assessment].
    Lőrincz J; Jakab A; Török P
    Orv Hetil; 2017 Mar; 158(9):324-330. PubMed ID: 28245679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated three-dimensional coded contrast imaging hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: feasibility in office tubal patency testing.
    Exacoustos C; Di Giovanni A; Szabolcs B; Romeo V; Romanini ME; Luciano D; Zupi E; Arduini D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 22648792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failed reversal of sterilization: transcervical transostial recannulation of occluded fallopian tube.
    Dunphy BC; Greene C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):274-5. PubMed ID: 8030716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tubal sterilization by selective catheterization in an animal model.
    Maubon A; Rouanet JP; Laurent A; Joujoux JM; Cover S; Courtieu C; Wassef M; Godlewski G; Honiger J; Lopez FM
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 8169090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation.
    Ott J; Hager M; Nouri K; Marschalek J; Kurz C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 30880158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.