BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19994496)

  • 1. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
    van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
    Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
    Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.
    Khatonabadi M; Kim HJ; Lu P; McMillan KL; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051903. PubMed ID: 23635273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.
    Hardy AJ; Bostani M; McMillan K; Zankl M; McCollough C; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4667-4682. PubMed ID: 30118143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: A single scanner pilot study.
    Tootell A; Szczepura K; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28390549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose conversion coefficients for CT examinations of adults with automatic tube current modulation.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Becker J; Hoeschen C
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6243-61. PubMed ID: 20885020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
    Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
    McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of effective doses to adult and pediatric patients from multislice computed tomography: A method based on energy imparted.
    Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Karantanas A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3846-56. PubMed ID: 17089849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Long DJ; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2129-46. PubMed ID: 22482634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating organ doses from tube current modulated CT examinations using a generalized linear model.
    Bostani M; McMillan K; Lu P; Kim GH; Cody D; Arbique G; Greenberg SB; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1500-1513. PubMed ID: 28112399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2864-74. PubMed ID: 17821994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
    Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
    Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.
    Bostani M; McMillan K; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112101. PubMed ID: 25370652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.
    Angel E; Yaghmai N; Jude CM; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Goldin JG; Primak AN; Stevens DM; Cody DD; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 19124953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.