734 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19994509)
21. Evaluation of image guided motion management methods in lung cancer radiotherapy.
Zhuang L; Yan D; Liang J; Ionascu D; Mangona V; Yang K; Zhou J
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031911. PubMed ID: 24593729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization in a quasi-periodically deforming patient model.
Söhn M; Weinmann M; Alber M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 19747782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The relative accuracy of 4D dose accumulation for lung radiotherapy using rigid dose projection versus dose recalculation on every breathing phase.
Valdes G; Lee C; Tenn S; Lee P; Robinson C; Iwamoto K; Low D; Lamb JM
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1120-1127. PubMed ID: 28019649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Motion as perturbation. II. Development of the method for dosimetric analysis of motion effects with fixed-gantry IMRT.
Nelms BE; Opp D; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061704. PubMed ID: 24877799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of planned dose on different CT image sets to four-dimensional Monte Carlo dose recalculation using the patient's actual breathing trace for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Freislederer P; von Münchow A; Kamp F; Heinz C; Gerum S; Corradini S; Söhn M; Reiner M; Roeder F; Floca R; Alber M; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3268-3277. PubMed ID: 31074510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantifying the effect of respiratory motion on lung tumour dosimetry with the aid of a breathing phantom with deforming lungs.
Nioutsikou E; Richard N Symonds-Tayler J; Bedford JL; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3359-74. PubMed ID: 16825735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is it sensible to "deform" dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping.
Yeo UJ; Taylor ML; Supple JR; Smith RL; Dunn L; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5065-72. PubMed ID: 22894432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Four-dimensional dose reconstruction through in vivo phase matching of cine images of electronic portal imaging device.
Yoon J; Jung JW; Kim JO; Yi BY; Yeo I
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4420. PubMed ID: 27370157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental verification of the Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation adjacent to heterogeneous media for IMRT and RapidArc of nasopharygeal carcinoma.
Kan MW; Leung LH; So RW; Yu PK
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031714. PubMed ID: 23464309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pencil beam approach for correcting the energy dependence artifact in film dosimetry for IMRT verification.
Kirov AS; Caravelli G; Palm A; Chui C; LoSasso T
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3690-9. PubMed ID: 17089835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Investigation of a novel algorithm for true 4D-VMAT planning with comparison to tracked, gated and static delivery.
Chin E; Otto K
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2698-707. PubMed ID: 21776806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of respiratory motion on passively scattered proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon therapy for stage III lung cancer: are proton plans more sensitive to breathing motion?
Matney J; Park PC; Bluett J; Chen YP; Liu W; Court LE; Liao Z; Li H; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):576-82. PubMed ID: 24074932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and sensitivity of four-dimensional dose calculation to systematic motion variability in stereotatic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tong AS; Tam EK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 13(6):3992. PubMed ID: 23149792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simulation of dosimetry impact of 4DCT uncertainty in 4D dose calculation for lung SBRT.
Liu G; Hu F; Ding X; Li X; Shao Q; Wang Y; Yang J; Quan H
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):1. PubMed ID: 30621744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Potential dosimetric benefits of four-dimensional radiation treatment planning.
Starkschall G; Britton K; McAleer MF; Jeter MD; Kaus MR; Bzdusek K; Mohan R; Cox JD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19231098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Four-dimensional treatment planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Guckenberger M; Wilbert J; Krieger T; Richter A; Baier K; Meyer J; Flentje M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 17707282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
