196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19994525)
1. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
Windt DL
Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources.
De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monochromatic x-rays for low-dose digital mammography: preliminary results.
Yoon KH; Kwon YM; Choi BJ; Son HH; Ryu CW; Chon KS; Park SH; Juhng SK
Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):683-7. PubMed ID: 22996316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy, angular and spatial distributions of primary electrons inside photoconducting materials for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6439-60. PubMed ID: 17951854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
Peplow DE; Verghese K
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of x-ray energy dispersion in digital subtraction imaging at the iodine K-edge--a Monte Carlo study.
Prino F; Ceballos C; Cabal A; Sarnelli A; Gambaccini M; Ramello L
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18293556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast tomosynthesis with monochromatic beams: a feasibility study using Monte Carlo simulations.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Kamarianakis Z; Fei B; Pallikarakis N
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4681-96. PubMed ID: 25082791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the glandular composition on digital breast tomosynthesis image quality and dose optimisation.
Marques T; Ribeiro A; Di Maria S; Belchior A; Cardoso J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Janeiro L; Almeida P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25836692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulation of breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.
Fitousi NT; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2069-77. PubMed ID: 22482628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
