197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19994525)
21. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.
Boone JM; Cooper VN
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1818-31. PubMed ID: 10984229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Monte Carlo simulation model of mammographic imaging with x-ray sources of finite dimensions.
Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Nikiforides G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(6):917-33. PubMed ID: 11936178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging.
Boone JM; Seibert JA
Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1853-63. PubMed ID: 7700192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Photon backscattering tissue characterization by energy dispersive spectroscopy evaluations.
Tartari A; Casnati E; Fernandez JE; Felsteiner J; Baraldi C
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Feb; 39(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 15552121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
Boone JM
Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
Chen B; Ning R
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation.
Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3341-57. PubMed ID: 9832020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microdosimetric characterisation of 28 kVp Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, Rh/Al, W/Rh and Mo/Rh mammography X ray spectra.
Verhaegen F; Castellano IA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12194338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography.
Wong J; Xu T; Husain A; Le H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3539-57. PubMed ID: 15446786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
