148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19995439)
1. A close examination of double filtering with fold change and T test in microarray analysis.
Zhang S; Cao J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():402. PubMed ID: 19995439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays.
McLachlan GJ; Bean RW; Jones LB
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(13):1608-15. PubMed ID: 16632494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of small n statistical tests of differential expression applied to microarrays.
Murie C; Woody O; Lee AY; Nadon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():45. PubMed ID: 19192265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A full Bayesian hierarchical mixture model for the variance of gene differential expression.
Manda SO; Walls RE; Gilthorpe MS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 8():124. PubMed ID: 17439644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.
Bar HY; Booth JG; Wells MT
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22499680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays.
Dean N; Raftery AE
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():173. PubMed ID: 16011807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comments on: fold change rank ordering statistics: a new method for detecting differentially expressed genes.
Dembélé D; Kastner P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):462. PubMed ID: 27846811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An empirical Bayes optimal discovery procedure based on semiparametric hierarchical mixture models.
Noma H; Matsui S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():568480. PubMed ID: 23690877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of differential gene expression algorithms: application comparing fold-change estimation to hypothesis testing.
Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():63. PubMed ID: 20109217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive filtering of microarray gene expression data based on Gaussian mixture decomposition.
Marczyk M; Jaksik R; Polanski A; Polanska J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():101. PubMed ID: 23510016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fully moderated T-statistic for small sample size gene expression arrays.
Yu L; Gulati P; Fernandez S; Pennell M; Kirschner L; Jarjoura D
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011 Sep; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 23089813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multivariate hierarchical Bayesian model for differential gene expression analysis in microarray experiments.
Zhao H; Chan KL; Cheng LM; Yan H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 18315862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The limit fold change model: a practical approach for selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
Mutch DM; Berger A; Mansourian R; Rytz A; Roberts MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2002 Jun; 3():17. PubMed ID: 12095422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A non-transformation method for identifying differentially expressed genes from cDNA microarrays.
Zhang JG; Yin ZJ; Zhang Q
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 16450591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified signal-to-noise: a new simple and practical gene filtering approach based on the concept of projective adaptive resonance theory (PART) filtering method.
Takahashi H; Honda H
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(13):1662-4. PubMed ID: 16632489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixture-model based estimation of gene expression variance from public database improves identification of differentially expressed genes in small sized microarray data.
Kim M; Cho SB; Kim JH
Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20015947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
