167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19995507)
1. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya G
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 19995507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 19(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 19732191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of ambient temperature and mixing time of glass ionomer cement material on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.
Kemoli AM
Contemp Clin Dent; 2014 Jan; 5(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24808692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Van Loveren C; Van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 May; 18(3):e529-32. PubMed ID: 23524424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
da Franca C; Colares V; Van Amerongen E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21401749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Six-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in permanent-tooth Class III restorations.
Prakki A; Nunes MC; Cefaly DF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Jun; 10(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 18652273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth.
Huth KC; Manhard J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 14579881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two minimally invasive methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: short-term results of a pilot study.
Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Mattos MC; Lauris JR; Ericson D; Navarro MF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 19089209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
