116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19995528)
1. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro examination of the visibility of 11 stent catheters with real-time MR imaging].
Zorger N; Pätzel C; Hamer OW; Lenhart M; Völk M; Herold T; Feuerbach S; Nitz WR
Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1311-8. PubMed ID: 15346267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.
Wall A; Kugel H; Bachman R; Matuszewski L; Krämer S; Heindel W; Maintz D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 16270296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.
Hähnel S; Nguyen-Trong TH; Rohde S; Hartmann M; Braun C; Sartor K; Heiland S
J Neuroradiol; 2006 Apr; 33(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16733419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent.
Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Mahnken A; Stuber M; Kölker C; Nguyen TH; Günther RW; Buecker A
Circulation; 2005 Mar; 111(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 15723984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.
Borisch I; Hamer OW; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Link J
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 May; 16(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 15872322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid artery after stenting.
Teng MM; Tsai F; Liou AJ; Lirng JF; Chang FC; Luo CB; Cheng HC
J Neuroimaging; 2004 Oct; 14(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 15358954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.
Lenhart M; Völk M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Strotzer M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 11012441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of three-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and steady-state gradient echo sequences in axial MRI examination of the cervical spine].
Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Ozer T; Erdem O; Erdem Z; Gündoğdu S
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 14730951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.
Wang Y; Truong TN; Yen C; Bilecen D; Watts R; Trost DW; Prince MR
Magn Reson Med; 2003 May; 49(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 12704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ability of MR cholangiography to reveal stent position and luminal diameter in patients with biliary endoprostheses: in vitro measurements and in vivo results in 30 patients.
Merkle EM; Boll DT; Weidenbach H; Brambs HJ; Gabelmann A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):913-8. PubMed ID: 11264077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.
Bartels LW; Smits HF; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11287516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.
Hug J; Nagel E; Bornstedt A; Schnackenburg B; Oswald H; Fleck E
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 10966711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen].
Straube T; Wolf S; Flesser A; Deli M; Alfke K; Nabavi A; Jansen O
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 15719299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A precious metal alloy for construction of MR imaging-compatible balloon-expandable vascular stents.
van Dijk LC; van Holten J; van Dijk BP; Matheijssen NA; Pattynama PM
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):284-7. PubMed ID: 11274571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphologic and dynamic renal imaging with assessment of glomerular filtration rate in a pcy-mouse model using a clinical 3.0 Tesla scanner.
Sadick M; Schock D; Kraenzlin B; Gretz N; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Aug; 44(8):469-75. PubMed ID: 19465861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents using MR angiography.
Hamer OW; Borisch I; Paetzel C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Zorger N
Br J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 79(944):636-43. PubMed ID: 16641417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
