BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19996647)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
    Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
    Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
    Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
    Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
    Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi.
    Grasso M; Beaghler M; Loisides P
    Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 7879330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
    Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].
    Netto JĂșnior NR; Claro JF
    Prog Urol; 1993 Feb; 3(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 8485594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. A comparative study].
    Xue ZY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 29(4):235-7, 271. PubMed ID: 1874112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
    Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].
    Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
    Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
    Salem HK
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques.
    Ghoneim IA; El-Ghoneimy MN; El-Naggar AE; Hammoud KM; El-Gammal MY; Morsi AA
    Urology; 2010 Jan; 75(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 19811806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi.
    Pearle MS; Nadler R; Bercowsky E; Chen C; Dunn M; Figenshau RS; Hoenig DM; McDougall EM; Mutz J; Nakada SY; Shalhav AL; Sundaram C; Wolf JS; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1255-60. PubMed ID: 11547053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zomorrodi A; Golivandan J; Samady J
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 May; 19(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 18445899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis.
    Lotan Y; Gettman MT; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
    J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1621-9. PubMed ID: 11912376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.