These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19997489)

  • 1. Defining an essence of structure determining residue contacts in proteins.
    Sathyapriya R; Duarte JM; Stehr H; Filippis I; Lappe M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Dec; 5(12):e1000584. PubMed ID: 19997489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks.
    Kukic P; Mirabello C; Tradigo G; Walsh I; Veltri P; Pollastri G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 15():6. PubMed ID: 24410833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fidelity of the protein structure reconstruction from inter-residue proximity constraints.
    Chen Y; Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jun; 111(25):7432-8. PubMed ID: 17542631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds.
    Soundararajan V; Raman R; Raguram S; Sasisekharan V; Sasisekharan R
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9391. PubMed ID: 20186337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families.
    Morcos F; Pagnani A; Lunt B; Bertolino A; Marks DS; Sander C; Zecchina R; Onuchic JN; Hwa T; Weigt M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(49):E1293-301. PubMed ID: 22106262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish between correct and incorrect protein models.
    Miller CS; Eisenberg D
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(14):1575-82. PubMed ID: 18511466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein-protein docking with reduced potentials by exploiting multi-dimensional energy funnels.
    Paschalidis ICh; Shen Y; Vakili P; Vajda S
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5330-3. PubMed ID: 17946298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit flexibility in protein docking: cross-docking and local refinement.
    Król M; Chaleil RA; Tournier AL; Bates PA
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 17671977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Attention-UNet Models to Predict Protein Contact Maps.
    Jisna VA; Ajay AP; Jayaraj PB
    J Comput Biol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):691-702. PubMed ID: 38979621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DeepCDpred: Inter-residue distance and contact prediction for improved prediction of protein structure.
    Ji S; Oruç T; Mead L; Rehman MF; Thomas CM; Butterworth S; Winn PJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0205214. PubMed ID: 30620738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein Residue Contacts and Prediction Methods.
    Adhikari B; Cheng J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():463-76. PubMed ID: 27115648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BCL::contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination.
    Karakaş M; Woetzel N; Meiler J
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 19772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts.
    Björkholm P; Daniluk P; Kryshtafovych A; Fidelis K; Andersson R; Hvidsten TR
    Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 25(10):1264-70. PubMed ID: 19289446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local descriptors of protein structure: a systematic analysis of the sequence-structure relationship in proteins using short- and long-range interactions.
    Hvidsten TR; Kryshtafovych A; Fidelis K
    Proteins; 2009 Jun; 75(4):870-84. PubMed ID: 19025980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
    Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. StructureDistiller: Structural relevance scoring identifies the most informative entries of a contact map.
    Bittrich S; Schroeder M; Labudde D
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18517. PubMed ID: 31811259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FingerprintContacts: Predicting Alternative Conformations of Proteins from Coevolution.
    Feng J; Shukla D
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 May; 124(18):3605-3615. PubMed ID: 32283936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.
    Yang YD; Spratt P; Chen H; Park C; Kihara D
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Aug; 23(8):617-32. PubMed ID: 20525730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.