144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19997585)
21. Predatory Publishing Is Alive and Well.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2020 Apr; 120(4):7. PubMed ID: 32218022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Full disclosure of financial interests in biomedical publications--a reminder.
Bailey BJ
Laryngoscope; 2002 Feb; 112(2):211-2. PubMed ID: 11889370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Sponsorship, authorship and accountability.
Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Nicholls MG; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van Der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS;
CMAJ; 2001 Sep; 165(6):786-8. PubMed ID: 11584570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ghostwriting in scientific anesthesia journals.
Cullen DJ
Anesthesiology; 1997 Aug; 87(2):195-6; discussion 197-200. PubMed ID: 9286879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
Jefferson T
Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know.
INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative
CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The process of publishing industry-affiliated articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Rohrich RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):757-760. PubMed ID: 24572865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Peer review under scrutiny. Report on the third International Congress in Prague, 1997.
Squires BP
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Jan; 44():15-6, 21-3. PubMed ID: 9498914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Addressing Authorship Issues Prospectively: A Heuristic Approach.
Roberts LW
Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):143-146. PubMed ID: 27355782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medical journals turn gaze inward to examine process of peer review.
Stephenson J
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(17):1389-91. PubMed ID: 9355982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
Moore A
Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. What authors need to know about the way editors think: report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
Neale AV
Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 11874024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.
Rennie D; Flanagin A
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1019-20. PubMed ID: 24618962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
Michell B
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review.
Van Rooyen S; Godlee F; Evans S; Smith R; Black N
J Gen Intern Med; 1999 Oct; 14(10):622-4. PubMed ID: 10571708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
