These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. [Researchers' free right of publishing]. Andersen D Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Oct; 163(44):6154. PubMed ID: 11715166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Publication and promotion. Is the system really broken? Jones AH Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9131):894-5. PubMed ID: 9742998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Scientific credit and credibility. Grant PM Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer. Bluestone N Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Claxton LD Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You. Nolfi DA; Lockhart JS; Myers CR Nurse Educ; 2015; 40(5):217-9. PubMed ID: 25997152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Who owns what I say? Oral presentations, scientific publications, and 'the times'. Parrish R Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Sep; 112(9):1157-8. PubMed ID: 8085959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at international congresses on peer review and biomedical publication. Malički M; von Elm E; Marušić A JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1065-7. PubMed ID: 24618970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Good initiative]. Engel T Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Nov; 163(46):6451. PubMed ID: 11816929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Blinded by the light: Anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees. Shaw DM EMBO Rep; 2015 Aug; 16(8):894-7. PubMed ID: 26174615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view. Senturia SD IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Bad science, sloppy reporting, and retracted publications: should peer review be the scapegoat? Thomas SP Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2014 Jun; 35(6):411-2. PubMed ID: 24857524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Financial conflicts of interest in the scientific publication world--and other good news. Friedberg EC DNA Repair (Amst); 2003 Nov; 2(11):1161. PubMed ID: 14599738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Publication and promotion. Writing is all. Lundberg GD Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9131):898. PubMed ID: 9743002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Rules for authors reporting results of sponsored research. Talley CR Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2001 Nov; 58(21):2024. PubMed ID: 11715822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]