230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19998119)
1. Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?
Wasson K
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):56-8. PubMed ID: 19998119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to open peer commentaries on "Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer personal genomics".
Lee SS; Crawley L
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W1-3. PubMed ID: 19998097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance--it is market failure.
Jordens CF; Kerridge IH; Samuel GN
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):13-5. PubMed ID: 19998103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario?
Caulfield T
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):48-50. PubMed ID: 19998115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):45-6. PubMed ID: 19998113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct-to-consumer genome-wide scans: astrologicogenomics or simple scams?
Hall W; Gartner C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):54-6. PubMed ID: 19998118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Social networking and personal genomics: suggestions for optimizing the interaction.
Greenbaum D; Gerstein M
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):15-9. PubMed ID: 19998104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?
Howard HC; Borry P
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):11-3. PubMed ID: 19998102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PGTandMe: social networking-based genetic testing and the evolving research model.
Koch VG
Health Matrix Clevel; 2012; 22(1):33-74. PubMed ID: 22616542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.
Knoppers BM
EMBO Rep; 2010 Jun; 11(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 20448662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?
Wallace SE; Gourna EG; Nikolova V; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 26645273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics.
Lee SS; Crawley L
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):35-44. PubMed ID: 19998112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personal genomics: democratization, or empowerment, or 'something'.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):46-8. PubMed ID: 19998114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Personal genomes: when consent gets in the way.
Taylor P
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):32-3. PubMed ID: 18987719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome scans get personal with online consumer services.
Ann Neurol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):A15-7. PubMed ID: 18306396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in the use of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing in children.
Tabor HK; Kelley M
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):32-4. PubMed ID: 19998111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research.
Prainsack B
Account Res; 2011 May; 18(3):132-47. PubMed ID: 21574070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genethics 2.0: phenotypes, genotypes, and the challenge of databases generated by personal genome testing.
Esposito K; Goodman K
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):19-21. PubMed ID: 19998105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CCMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
; Nelson TN; Armstrong L; Richer J; Evans J; Lauzon J; McGillivray B; Bruyere H; Dougan S
Clin Genet; 2012 Jan; 81(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21943145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Bunnik EM; de Jong A; Nijsingh N; de Wert GM
Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 23718722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
