171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19998122)
21. It is settled: the 'is' can (and should) inform the 'ought'!
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W4-6. PubMed ID: 19998100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Who is buying normative bioethics research?
Tsai AC
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Aug; 8(8):62-3. PubMed ID: 18802870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensible discussion in bioethics: reflections on interdisciplinary research.
Arnason V
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16028546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Decisions devoid of data?
Halpern SD
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):55-6; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of empirical research in bioethics.
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):59-65. PubMed ID: 19998120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is bioethics broke?: on the idea of ethics and law "catching up" with technology.
Shapiro MH
Indiana Law Rev; 1999; 33(1):17-162. PubMed ID: 12680378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Strange bedfellows? Reflections on bioethics' role in disaster response planning.
Berg J; King N
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(5):3-5. PubMed ID: 16997809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.
Frith L
Bioethics; 2012 May; 26(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 21039690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bioethics and the conditions for human agency.
Arnason V
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 22377068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An apology for Socratic bioethics.
Miller FG; Truog RD
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):3-7. PubMed ID: 18759171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Future issues in bioethics.
Flanigan R
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 11653184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A Conceptual Model for the Translation of Bioethics Research and Scholarship.
Mathews DJ; Hester DM; Kahn J; McGuire A; McKinney R; Meador K; Philpott-Jones S; Youngner S; Wilfond BS
Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Sep; 46(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 27649827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shifting paradigms in bioethics and health law: the rise of a new pragmatism.
Wolf SM
Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(4):395-415. PubMed ID: 7618636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Challenging norms in bioethics--helping others to find their voice.
DeCoster B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):9-11. PubMed ID: 18759174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. What has bioethics to offer health policy?
Wikler D
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 1791789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Moral intuitions as a source for empirical ethics.
van Delden JJ
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):20-4. PubMed ID: 15282915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Principles versus practice in bioethics.
Durban PT
Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 3569611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.
Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15139254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioethics and politics: "doing ethics" in the public square.
Pellegrino ED
J Med Philos; 2006 Dec; 31(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 17162728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. "Who lost China?" A foreshadowing of today's ideological disputes in bioethics.
Caplan A
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 16092392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
