258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19998133)
1. A view from the borderlands of philosophical bioethics and empirical social science research: how the 'is' can inform the 'ought'.
Myser C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):88-91. PubMed ID: 19998133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. It is settled: the 'is' can (and should) inform the 'ought'!
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W4-6. PubMed ID: 19998100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical bioethics research in the developing world: when the 'is' is close to an 'ought'.
Emerson CI; Upshur RE; Daar AS
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):101-3. PubMed ID: 19998138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What empirical research can do for bioethics.
Hoffmaster B; Hooker C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):72-4. PubMed ID: 19998125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Kon's reinvention of the empirical bioethics wheel.
Holm S
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):69-70. PubMed ID: 19998123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hurrah for empirical bioethics (where hermeneutically clarified) or how perception of facts 'depends' on values.
Schultz DS
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):95-9. PubMed ID: 19998136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An engine, not a pyramid.
Viso AM; da Rocha AC
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):81-3. PubMed ID: 19998130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychology and medical decision-making.
Suhler C; Churchland P
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):79-81. PubMed ID: 19998129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Empiricism, values, and bioethics.
Kirkwood K
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):91-2. PubMed ID: 19998134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Realizing bioethics' goals in practice: ten ways "is" can help "ought".
Solomon MZ
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(4):40-7. PubMed ID: 16225305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to build a theory about empirical bioethics: acknowledging the limitations of empirical research.
Fry CL
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):83-5. PubMed ID: 19998131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conceptualizing disease: unifying the divide between philosophical inquiry and empirical research.
Aultman JM
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):78-9. PubMed ID: 19998128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical bioethics: present and future possibilities.
Shelton W
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):74-5. PubMed ID: 19998126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Answering the 'so what?' question for empirical research in bioethics.
Wynia MK
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):68-9. PubMed ID: 19998122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beware dichotomies and grand abstractions: attending to particularity and practice in empirical bioethics.
Carter SM
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):76-7. PubMed ID: 19998127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodology, epistemology, and empirical bioethics research: a constructive/ist commentary.
Dunn M; Ives J
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):93-5. PubMed ID: 19998135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Which naturalism for bioethics? A defense of moderate (pragmatic) naturalism.
Racine E
Bioethics; 2008 Feb; 22(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 18251769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving care and ethics: a plea for interactive empirical ethics.
Widdershoven G; Molewijk B; Abma T
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):99-101. PubMed ID: 19998137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of empirical research in bioethics.
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):59-65. PubMed ID: 19998120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based research ethics.
Kalichman M
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):85-7. PubMed ID: 19998132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
