These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A closer look at the abortion debate in Iran. Aramesh K Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):57-8. PubMed ID: 19998164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From Iran to Latin America: must prenatal diagnosis necessarily be provided with abortion for congenital abnormalities? Sperling D Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):61-3. PubMed ID: 19998166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An unjustified exception to an unjust law? Wasserman D; Asch A Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 19998167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal diagnosis and abortion are not in conflict in Israel. Zivotofsky AZ; Jotkowitz A Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):58-60. PubMed ID: 19998165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal testing can be advantageous even when abortion is not an option. Kon AA Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):69-70. PubMed ID: 19998170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to open peer commentaries on "Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other?". Ballantyne A; Newson A; Luna F; Ashcroft R Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W6-7. PubMed ID: 19998146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other? Ballantyne A; Newson A; Luna F; Ashcroft R Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):48-56. PubMed ID: 19998163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion: prohibitions and exceptions. McGuinness S Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):70-2. PubMed ID: 19998171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of prenatal screening: new developments challenging the ethical framework. Dondorp W; van Lith J Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):ii-iv. PubMed ID: 25521974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A feminist understanding of sex-selective abortion: solely a matter of choice? Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10(2):161-223. PubMed ID: 12739593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument. Trotter G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future. de Jong A; de Wert GM Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal. Munthe C Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators. Eberl JT Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe. Manninen BA Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management. McGivern B E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E9. PubMed ID: 16969924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening. Hewison J Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 25521969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]