These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19998686)

  • 21. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years.
    Pogorzelska M; Stone PW; Cohn EG; Larson E
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):181-7. PubMed ID: 20637931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An introduction to institutional review boards.
    Sims JM
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2008; 27(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 18724181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. All inclusive benchmarking.
    Ellis J
    J Nurs Manag; 2006 Jul; 14(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 16787472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Working with human research protections.
    Arford PH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2004; 36(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 15495497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Office of Human Research Protections.
    Chamberlain B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Institutional Review Board: a case study of no-risk decisions in health-related research.
    Gortner SR; Heath E; Sanders P
    Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 6906010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ethical issues in nursing research: access to human subjects.
    Scott DW
    Top Clin Nurs; 1982 Apr; 4(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11649725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responsible conduct of radiology research. Part IV. The boundary of research and practice.
    Cooper JA
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):383-4. PubMed ID: 16244246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Running the ethics race.
    Callery P
    Paediatr Nurs; 2004 Nov; 16(9):13. PubMed ID: 15574023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PRISM: Priority Symptom Management Project phase I: assessment.
    Ropka ME; Spencer-Cisek P
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001; 28(10):1585-94. PubMed ID: 11759306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commentary: refusing to give up on forensic research.
    Young JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):368-70. PubMed ID: 16186202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The institutional review board: a critical revisit to the protection of human subjects.
    Rutecki GW; Youtsey M; Adelson B
    Ethics Med; 2002; 18(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 14700023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethics committees in the United States.
    Capron AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is it appropriate for research ethics committees to make judgements about the scientific quality of research proposals?
    Brecher B; Gardener G; Velepič M; Walsh A; Belshaw C; Holland S
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Jan; 18(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 21285203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.