156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19999038)
1. [Setting limit values for chemical substances in the workplace: DNEL(INH) setting according to REACH principles following the example of 2-butyne-1,4-diol].
Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Swiercz R
Med Pr; 2009; 60(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 19999038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting REACH guidance in the determination of the derived no effect level (DNEL).
Kreider ML; Spencer Williams E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 20655351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
Schenk L
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of human biomonitoring (HBM) of chemical exposure in the characterisation of health risks under REACH.
Boogaard PJ; Aylward LL; Hays SM
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 22177527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
Gromiec J
Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the potential human health risks from exposure to complex substances in accordance with REACH requirements. "White spirit" as a case study.
McKee RH; Tibaldi R; Adenuga MD; Carrillo JC; Margary A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Feb; 92():439-457. PubMed ID: 29069582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human biomonitoring as a pragmatic tool to support health risk management of chemicals--examples under the EU REACH programme.
Boogaard PJ; Hays SM; Aylward LL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 20933039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Derived no-effect levels (DNELs) under the European chemicals regulation REACH--an analysis of long-term inhalation worker-DNELs presented by industry.
Schenk L; Deng U; Johanson G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):416-38. PubMed ID: 25471229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
Schenk L; Johanson G
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chemical exposure and risk assessment at workplaces--modeling approach.
Mäkinen M; Hämäläinen M; Forsman K; Liesivuori J
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Nov; 17(11):744-9. PubMed ID: 12419101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of worker inhalation derived no effect levels for tungsten compounds.
Jackson M; Lemus-Olalde R; Inhof C; Venezia C; Pardus M
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2013; 16(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 23682648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.
Lavoué J; Milon A; Droz PO
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):747-56. PubMed ID: 18687973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.
Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U; Packroff R
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):449-62. PubMed ID: 19531808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fractional and component composition of dust in the air of workplace at machinery enterprise].
Maĭ IV; Zagorodnov SIu; Maks AA
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (12):12-5. PubMed ID: 23461182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A consistent and transparent approach for calculation of Derived No-Effect Levels (DNELs) for petroleum substances.
Boogaard PJ; Banton MI; Dalbey W; Hedelin AS; Riley AJ; Rushton EK; Vaissière M; Minsavage GD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 62(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 22178770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Background on the system of integral evaluation of human exposure to toxic substances in the work and municipal environments.
Dutkiewicz T; Kończalik J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1999; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 10581867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
