These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2000016)

  • 1. Functional use of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant in the elderly.
    Horn KL; McMahon NB; McMahon DC; Lewis JS; Barker M; Gherini S
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Mar; 101(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 2000016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implantation in the elderly.
    Kelsall DC; Shallop JK; Burnelli T
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 8588665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.
    Francis HW; Chee N; Yeagle J; Cheng A; Niparko JK
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1482-8. PubMed ID: 12172266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of cochlear implants from the perspective of significant others of adult cochlear implant users.
    Kennedy V; Stephens D; Fitzmaurice P
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 18401287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users.
    Kou BS; Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8170029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients.
    Maillet CJ; Tyler RS; Jordan HN
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Apr; 165():31-48. PubMed ID: 7717632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life.
    Faber CE; Grøntved AM
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2000; 543():151-3. PubMed ID: 10909006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting choice of device by cochlear implant candidates.
    Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Wolf M; Kronenberg J
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):743-6. PubMed ID: 19638937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cochlear implantation in adults. Results and significance for communication and quality of life].
    Faber CE; Grøntved AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Feb; 162(7):927-31. PubMed ID: 10740434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients.
    Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino FG
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 15744155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality of life after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults].
    Liu B; Chen XQ; Kong Y; Li YX; Mo LY; Zheng J; Liu S; Chen ZS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 88(22):1550-2. PubMed ID: 18956638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Auditory achievements of cochlear implantation].
    Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C; Tenne S; Leventon G; Wolf M; Bendet E; Kronenberg J
    Harefuah; 1993 Apr; 124(8):457-60, 528. PubMed ID: 8335267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents.
    Kelsay DM; Tyler RS
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 8915415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of factors effecting satisfaction of cochlear implants in prelingually deafened adolescents].
    Liu S; Han DM; Zhao XT; Deng ZF; Wu X; Kong Y; Chen XQ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 85(10):693-6. PubMed ID: 15932735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.
    Cullen RD; Higgins C; Buss E; Clark M; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Dec; 114(12):2218-23. PubMed ID: 15564849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantation in the senior citizen age group using the Nucleus 22-channel device.
    Facer GW; Peterson AM; Brey RH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():187-90. PubMed ID: 7668629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived qualitative benefits of cochlear implants in children with multi-handicaps.
    Wiley S; Jahnke M; Meinzen-Derr J; Choo D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):791-8. PubMed ID: 15885331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.