215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000193)
1. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide.
Kuzmanović D; Lyons KM
N Z Dent J; 2009 Dec; 105(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20000193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter.
Tung FF; Goldstein GR; Jang S; Hittelman E
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 12488850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.
Li Q; Wang YN
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):848-54. PubMed ID: 17919252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
Hammad IA
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
Kanawati A; Richards MW
Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
Alomari M; Chadwick RG
Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
