These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000193)

  • 21. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison.
    Paul SJ; Peter A; Rodoni L; Pietrobon N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 15227770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
    Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Lagouvardos PE; Fougia AG; Diamantopoulou SA; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 19105990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides.
    Corciolani G; Vichi A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18996635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical study to compare two in-office (chairside) whitening systems.
    Gallagher A; Maggio B; Bowman J; Borden L; Mason S; Felix H
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):219-24. PubMed ID: 12518494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An assessment of shade taking by dental undergraduates.
    McAndrew R; Chan PW; Milward PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 20397497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Colour compatibility between teeth and dental shade guides in Quinquagenarians and Septuagenarians.
    Cocking C; Cevirgen E; Helling S; Oswald M; Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Reinelt G; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):848-55. PubMed ID: 19793231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter.
    Klemetti E; Matela AM; Haag P; Kononen M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16409514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides.
    Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 9863448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides.
    Cal E; Sonugelen M; Guneri P; Kesercioglu A; Kose T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 15140175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of colour defective vision on shade matching accuracy.
    Ethell J; Jarad FD; Youngson CC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Sep; 14(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Colorimetric evaluation of vita shade resin composites.
    Swift EJ; Hammel SA; Lund PS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 7993547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods.
    Igiel C; Weyhrauch M; Wentaschek S; Scheller H; Lehmann KM
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 26830824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.
    Douglas RD; Steinhauer TJ; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):200-8. PubMed ID: 17499089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.