BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000531)

  • 1. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) adsorption by aquifer sediments from a former mill tailings site at Rifle, Colorado.
    Hyun SP; Fox PM; Davis JA; Campbell KM; Hayes KF; Long PE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9368-73. PubMed ID: 20000531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments at the Hanford Site.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Brown CF; Last GV
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):255-69. PubMed ID: 17499879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-Area Savannah River Site.
    Dong W; Tokunaga TK; Davis JA; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1565-71. PubMed ID: 22191402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone--aquifer system.
    Murray CJ; Zachara JM; McKinley JP; Ward A; Bott YJ; Draper K; Moore D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():122-40. PubMed ID: 23664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorption of uranium (VI) on homoionic sodium smectite experimental study and surface complexation modeling.
    Korichi S; Bensmaili A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):780-93. PubMed ID: 19428178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for estimating adsorbed uranium(VI) and distribution coefficients of contaminated sediments.
    Kohler M; Curtis GP; Meece DE; Davis JA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jan; 38(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 14740742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying key controls on the behavior of an acidic-U(VI) plume in the Savannah River Site using reactive transport modeling.
    Bea SA; Wainwright H; Spycher N; Faybishenko B; Hubbard SS; Denham ME
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():34-54. PubMed ID: 23707874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone.
    Zachara JM; Long PE; Bargar J; Davis JA; Fox P; Fredrickson JK; Freshley MD; Konopka AE; Liu C; McKinley JP; Rockhold ML; Williams KH; Yabusaki SB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():45-72. PubMed ID: 23500840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of uranyl-calcium-carbonato complexes on uranium(VI) adsorption to synthetic and natural sediments.
    Stewart BD; Mayes MA; Fendorf S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(3):928-34. PubMed ID: 20058915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition effect of secondary phosphate mineral precipitation on uranium release from contaminated sediments.
    Shi Z; Liu C; Zachara JM; Wang Z; Deng B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8344-9. PubMed ID: 19924967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of sorption-retarded U(VI) diffusion in Hanford silt/clay material.
    Bai J; Liu C; Ball WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7706-11. PubMed ID: 19921882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of grain size on uranium(VI) surface complexation kinetics and adsorption additivity.
    Shang J; Liu C; Wang Z; Zachara JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):6025-31. PubMed ID: 21648458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater following stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction.
    N'Guessan AL; Vrionis HA; Resch CT; Long PE; Lovley DR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):2999-3004. PubMed ID: 18497157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immobilization of U(VI) from oxic groundwater by Hanford 300 Area sediments and effects of Columbia River water.
    Ahmed B; Cao B; Mishra B; Boyanov MI; Kemner KM; Fredrickson JK; Beyenal H
    Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):3989-98. PubMed ID: 22683408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No measurable changes in (238)U/(235)U due to desorption-adsorption of U(VI) from groundwater at the Rifle, Colorado, integrated field research challenge site.
    Shiel AE; Laubach PG; Johnson TM; Lundstrom CC; Long PE; Williams KH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2535-41. PubMed ID: 23379698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Luo J; Weber FA; Cirpka OA; Wu WM; Nyman JL; Carley J; Jardine PM; Criddle CS; Kitanidis PK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):129-48. PubMed ID: 17291626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptual and numerical model of uranium(VI) reductive immobilization in fractured subsurface sediments.
    Roden EE; Scheibe TD
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(5):617-28. PubMed ID: 15792659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carbonate effects on hexavalent uranium removal from water by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide.
    Wazne M; Meng X; Korfiatis GP; Christodoulatos C
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16352391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling uranium transport in acidic contaminated groundwater with base addition.
    Zhang F; Luo W; Parker JC; Brooks SC; Watson DB; Jardine PM; Gu B
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Jun; 190(1-3):863-8. PubMed ID: 21531075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arsenic attenuation by oxidized aquifer sediments in Bangladesh.
    Stollenwerk KG; Breit GN; Welch AH; Yount JC; Whitney JW; Foster AL; Uddin MN; Majumder RK; Ahmed N
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jul; 379(2-3):133-50. PubMed ID: 17250876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.