These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000587)

  • 21. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. AutoDock-SS: AutoDock for Multiconformational Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
    Ni B; Wang H; Khalaf HKS; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3779-3789. PubMed ID: 38624083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis.
    Sperandio O; Mouawad L; Pinto E; Villoutreix BO; Perahia D; Miteva MA
    Eur Biophys J; 2010 Aug; 39(9):1365-72. PubMed ID: 20237920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Applying atomistic neural networks to bias conformer ensembles towards bioactive-like conformations.
    Baillif B; Cole J; Giangreco I; McCabe P; Bender A
    J Cheminform; 2023 Dec; 15(1):124. PubMed ID: 38129933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fragment-Based Analysis of Ligand Dockings Improves Classification of Actives.
    Belew RK; Forli S; Goodsell DS; O'Donnell TJ; Olson AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1597-607. PubMed ID: 27384036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benchmarking Data Sets for the Evaluation of Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Review and Perspectives.
    Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1297-307. PubMed ID: 26038804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using consensus-shape clustering to identify promiscuous ligands and protein targets and to choose the right query for shape-based virtual screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1233-48. PubMed ID: 21604699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved docking, screening and selectivity prediction for small molecule nuclear receptor modulators using conformational ensembles.
    Park SJ; Kufareva I; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 May; 24(5):459-71. PubMed ID: 20455005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.
    Lorber DM; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 1998 Apr; 7(4):938-50. PubMed ID: 9568900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. LigQ: A Webserver to Select and Prepare Ligands for Virtual Screening.
    Radusky L; Ruiz-Carmona S; Modenutti C; Barril X; Turjanski AG; Martí MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Aug; 57(8):1741-1746. PubMed ID: 28700230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening.
    Huang Z; Wong CF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jan; 56(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 26651874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to benchmark methods for structure-based virtual screening of large compound libraries.
    Christofferson AJ; Huang N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():187-95. PubMed ID: 22183538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
    Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrating ligand-based and protein-centric virtual screening of kinase inhibitors using ensembles of multiple protein kinase genes and conformations.
    Dixit A; Verkhivker GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2501-15. PubMed ID: 22992037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Teaching old docks new tricks with machine learning enhanced ensemble docking.
    Bhatt R; Wang A; Durrant JD
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20722. PubMed ID: 39237737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.