These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000930)

  • 21. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A logistic prediction model for individual allowable noise levels.
    Furihata K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3544-60. PubMed ID: 19206784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variation in spectral-shape discrimination weighting functions at different stimulus levels and signal strengths.
    Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1702. PubMed ID: 17927430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli.
    Pastore RE; Flint J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method for time-varying annoyance rating of aircraft noise.
    Dickson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19603854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors influencing tinnitus loudness and annoyance.
    Hiller W; Goebel G
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Dec; 132(12):1323-30. PubMed ID: 17178943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1975-87. PubMed ID: 19813809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
    Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
    Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence of stochastic resonance in an auditory discrimination task may reflect response bias.
    Shepherd D; Hautus MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1931-40. PubMed ID: 19933574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Tardieu J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1631-44. PubMed ID: 20822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jan; 75(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 6699282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.
    Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on binaural loudness summation.
    Shao Z; Mo F; Mao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.