These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000931)

  • 1. What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Pressnitzer D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3179-87. PubMed ID: 20000931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors.
    Demany L; Pressnitzer D; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1342-8. PubMed ID: 19739748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing centre in Heschl's gyrus.
    Puschmann S; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1641-9. PubMed ID: 19782757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictability affects the perception of audiovisual synchrony in complex sequences.
    Cook LA; Van Valkenburg DL; Badcock DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2286-97. PubMed ID: 21800221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dominant region for the pitch of complex tones with low fundamental frequencies.
    Jackson HM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1193-204. PubMed ID: 23927118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 17134873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of pitch, loudness, and timbre on the perception of instrument dynamics.
    Fabiani M; Friberg A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL193-9. PubMed ID: 21974491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of pitch and time sequences in music.
    Neuhaus C; Knösche TR
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory change detection: simple sounds are not memorized better than complex sounds.
    Demany L; Trost W; Serman M; Semal C
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jan; 19(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 18181796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.
    Graves JE; Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2338-47. PubMed ID: 25365571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing.
    Marmel F; Perrin F; Tillmann B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3095-104. PubMed ID: 21265601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural, functional, and perceptual differences in Heschl's gyrus and musical instrument preference.
    Schneider P; Sluming V; Roberts N; Bleeck S; Rupp A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():387-94. PubMed ID: 16597790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons--an ERP study.
    Müller M; Höfel L; Brattico E; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 20153786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Process timing and its relation to the coding of tonal harmony.
    Aksentijevic A; Barber PJ; Elliott MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1628-42. PubMed ID: 21500937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.