136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000934)
1. Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Van den Bogaert T; Moonen M; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3209-13. PubMed ID: 20000934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2817-26. PubMed ID: 22087910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.
Seeber BU; Fastl H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1030-42. PubMed ID: 18247905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound localization and binaural hearing in children with a hearing aid and a cochlear implant.
Beijen J; Snik AF; Straatman LV; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19451708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.
Francart T; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2826-31. PubMed ID: 18189572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the horizontal plane.
Musa-Shufani S; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 16672796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaural level difference cues determine sound source localization by single-sided deaf patients fit with a cochlear implant.
Dorman MF; Zeitler D; Cook SJ; Loiselle L; Yost WA; Wanna GB; Gifford RH
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 25896774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants.
Neuman AC; Haravon A; Sislian N; Waltzman SB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 17204900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Sound localization cues of binaural hearing].
Paulus E
Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Apr; 82(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 12717598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e341-5. PubMed ID: 27054512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
