These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000936)
1. Analysis of acoustic reduction using spectral similarity measures. Hämäläinen A; Gubian M; ten Bosch L; Boves L J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3227-35. PubMed ID: 20000936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production. Silbert N; de Jong K J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comment on "A geometric representation of spectral and temporal vowel features: quantification of vowel overlap in three linguistic varieties" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2334-2350 (2006)]. Morrison GS J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 18177135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Pluymaekers M; Ernestus M; Baayen RH J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2561-9. PubMed ID: 16266176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release. Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency distributions of uniphones, diphones, and triphones in spontaneous speech. Kuperman V; Ernestus M; Baayen H J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3897-908. PubMed ID: 19206815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal structure of spoken-word recognition in Croatian in light of the cohort theory. Erdeljac V; Mildner V Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 10433745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spectral and temporal reduction as stress cues in Dutch. van Heuven VJ; de Jonge M Phonetica; 2011; 68(3):120-32. PubMed ID: 22143147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the role of articulatory prosodies in German message decoding. Kohler KJ; Niebuhr O Phonetica; 2011; 68(1-2):57-87. PubMed ID: 21804333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rhythmic structure of Hindi and English: new insights from a computational analysis. Das T; Singh L; Singh NC Prog Brain Res; 2008; 168():207-72. PubMed ID: 18166397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unsupervised speech segmentation: an analysis of the hypothesized phone boundaries. Scharenborg O; Wan V; Ernestus M J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20136229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L). Cutler A J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3522-5. PubMed ID: 19507933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives. Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3962-73. PubMed ID: 19507978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects. Strange W; Weber A; Levy ES; Shafiro V; Hisagi M; Nishi K J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1111-29. PubMed ID: 17672658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition. Dilley LC; Pitt MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2340-53. PubMed ID: 17902869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm? Wiget L; White L; Schuppler B; Grenon I; Rauch O; Mattys SL J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1559-69. PubMed ID: 20329856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Seyfarth S Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):140-55. PubMed ID: 25019178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence. Fisher C; Tokura H Child Dev; 1996 Dec; 67(6):3192-218. PubMed ID: 9071777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separating contributions of hearing, lexical knowledge, and speech production to speech-perception scores in children with hearing impairments. Paatsch LE; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Martin LF; Bow CP J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):738-50. PubMed ID: 15324283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]