25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20000937)
1. Verification of Estimated Output Signal-to-Noise Ratios From a Phase Inversion Technique Using a Simulated Hearing Aid.
Yun D; Shen Y; Lentz JJ
Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):197-209. PubMed ID: 36706459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
Kowalewski B; Dau T; May T
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520930531. PubMed ID: 32573373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
May T; Kowalewski B; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518790903. PubMed ID: 30117366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.
Kates JM; Arehart KH; Anderson MC; Kumar Muralimanohar R; Harvey LO
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 29554034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Output signal-to-noise ratio and speech perception in noise: effects of algorithm.
Miller CW; Bentler RA; Wu YH; Lewis J; Tremblay K
Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(8):568-579. PubMed ID: 28355951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
Plomp R
Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications.
Souza P; Arehart K; Neher T
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1894. PubMed ID: 26733899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3236-45. PubMed ID: 20000937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
Kates JM
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
