283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20001293)
1. Breast cancer screening: science, society and common sense.
Lyman GH
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20001293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
Patti J; Lee C
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
Ringash J;
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
Berlin L; Hall FM
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
Petitti DB; Calonge N; LeFevre ML; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ; Schwartz JS;
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20574080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography for women aged 40-49: are we off the fence yet?
Barton MB
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 11233871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Eisinger F
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(22):1742; author reply 1742, 1742-3. PubMed ID: 20966429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening Mammography for Average-Risk Women: The Controversy and NCCN's Position.
Helvie MA; Bevers TB
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 30442738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20574081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer screening in women: An integrative literature review.
Ravert PK; Huffaker C
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Dec; 22(12):668-73. PubMed ID: 21129075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
Baines CJ
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening.
DeAngelis CD; Fontanarosa PB
JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):172-3. PubMed ID: 20068215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast care imaging: ghost of past?
Emahiser LJ; Wood BD
Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 22461349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography in younger women: the dilemma of diminishing returns.
Calonge N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):668-9. PubMed ID: 20439837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are mammography recommendations in women younger than 40 related to increased risk?
Kapp JM; Yankaskas BC; LeFevre ML
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(2):485-90. PubMed ID: 19148745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Screening: Why Can't Everyone Agree?
Jordan V; Khan M; Prill D
Prim Care; 2019 Mar; 46(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 30704663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines - much ado about small improvements.
Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC
Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 26718110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening Mammography in Women 40-49 Years Old: Current Evidence.
Ray KM; Joe BN; Freimanis RI; Sickles EA; Hendrick RE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 29064760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
