134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20001936)
1. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
Long JP; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Wirth CJ; Gossé F
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1522-7. PubMed ID: 18978277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.
Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():86-91. PubMed ID: 17632416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing.
Springer BD; Connelly SE; Odum SM; Fehring TK; Griffin WL; Mason JB; Masonis JL
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):2-8. PubMed ID: 19556097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The biomechanical consequence of insufficient femoral component lateralization and exposed cancellous bone in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Whyne CM; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081011. PubMed ID: 20670060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: what have we learned?
Amstutz HC; Campbell P; Le Duff MJ
Instr Course Lect; 2007; 56():149-61. PubMed ID: 17472303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
